News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Replies: 10401
Total votes: : 4

Last post: Today at 06:19:55 PM
Re: Forum gossip thread by Lab Flaker

Weak men more likely to be socialists, study claims

Started by Anonymous, March 01, 2019, 11:22:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Window Lickers are viewing this topic.

Anonymous

I believe this. It's been said liberalism is a mental disease. Socialism is too, as well as a physical ailment. ac_toofunny  ac_lmfao


QuoteA new study from Brunel University London found that physically weaker men are more apt to believe in socialist policies, such as redistribution of wealth. Meanwhile, stronger men are more geared to believe in the capitalist concepts, such as the idea that people should keep what you earn.



Brunel University academics studied 171 men aged 18 - 40, examining their overall physical strength, bicep circumference, weight, and height. They also noted the amount of time each individual spent at a gym, and examined these variables in light of whether they subscribed more to capitalist or socialist ideologies. They found that the more physically strong the men were, the less they believed in socialist policies, and the more they believed certain social groups should be dominant.



According to The Times, Brunel University's senior lecturer in Psychology in the College of Health and Life Sciences Michael Price said the study raises questions about the correlation between physical strength and egalitarianism — and also poses something of a "chicken or the egg" philosophical question.



Additionally, Price found that stronger men tend to reject the redistribution of wealth, whether they are financially rich or poor.



"Our results suggest that wealthier men who are more formidable physically are more likely to oppose redistribution of wealth. Essentially, they seem more motivated to defend their resources. But less wealthy men who are still physically formidable don't seem more inclined to support redistribution either," Price said. "They're not demanding a share of the wealth."

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/25/study-physically-weak-men-more-likely-to-be-socialist-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist">https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/2 ... capitalist">https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/25/study-physically-weak-men-more-likely-to-be-socialist-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist

Bricktop


Anonymous

Quote from: "Shen Li"I believe this. It's been said liberalism is a mental disease. Socialism is too, as well as a physical ailment. ac_toofunny  ac_lmfao


QuoteA new study from Brunel University London found that physically weaker men are more apt to believe in socialist policies, such as redistribution of wealth. Meanwhile, stronger men are more geared to believe in the capitalist concepts, such as the idea that people should keep what you earn.



Brunel University academics studied 171 men aged 18 - 40, examining their overall physical strength, bicep circumference, weight, and height. They also noted the amount of time each individual spent at a gym, and examined these variables in light of whether they subscribed more to capitalist or socialist ideologies. They found that the more physically strong the men were, the less they believed in socialist policies, and the more they believed certain social groups should be dominant.



According to The Times, Brunel University's senior lecturer in Psychology in the College of Health and Life Sciences Michael Price said the study raises questions about the correlation between physical strength and egalitarianism — and also poses something of a "chicken or the egg" philosophical question.



Additionally, Price found that stronger men tend to reject the redistribution of wealth, whether they are financially rich or poor.



"Our results suggest that wealthier men who are more formidable physically are more likely to oppose redistribution of wealth. Essentially, they seem more motivated to defend their resources. But less wealthy men who are still physically formidable don't seem more inclined to support redistribution either," Price said. "They're not demanding a share of the wealth."

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/25/study-physically-weak-men-more-likely-to-be-socialist-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist">https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/2 ... capitalist">https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/25/study-physically-weak-men-more-likely-to-be-socialist-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist

I know you are trolling, but this "study" is hogwash. First of all, progressives like Peaches and his idiotic heroine AOC are NOT SOCIALISTS. They are progressives. They will be the eulogy of the blue collar working classes.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Bricktop"Me and Herm are CAPITALISTS!!!

You and Herm are real men. IHJ plays with choo choos.

Bricktop


Anonymous

Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Bricktop"Me and Herm are CAPITALISTS!!!

You and Herm are real men. IHJ plays with choo choos.

Do those "real men" have responsibility for 20,000 tons of bulk commodities, some of which could wipe out a city? That's for sissy socialists right. :crazy:

Anonymous

Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Bricktop"Me and Herm are CAPITALISTS!!!

You and Herm are real men. IHJ plays with choo choos.

Do those "real men" have responsibility for 20,000 tons of bulk commodities, some of which could wipe out a city? That's for sissy socialists right. :crazy:

Defensive or what.

Bricktop


Anonymous

Quote from: "Bricktop"Train drivers are the BEST!!!

Best post. :thumbup:



Factoid, the heaviest freight train of all time was in Australia, not Russia.

Anonymous

Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Shen Li"I believe this. It's been said liberalism is a mental disease. Socialism is too, as well as a physical ailment. ac_toofunny  ac_lmfao


QuoteA new study from Brunel University London found that physically weaker men are more apt to believe in socialist policies, such as redistribution of wealth. Meanwhile, stronger men are more geared to believe in the capitalist concepts, such as the idea that people should keep what you earn.



Brunel University academics studied 171 men aged 18 - 40, examining their overall physical strength, bicep circumference, weight, and height. They also noted the amount of time each individual spent at a gym, and examined these variables in light of whether they subscribed more to capitalist or socialist ideologies. They found that the more physically strong the men were, the less they believed in socialist policies, and the more they believed certain social groups should be dominant.



According to The Times, Brunel University's senior lecturer in Psychology in the College of Health and Life Sciences Michael Price said the study raises questions about the correlation between physical strength and egalitarianism — and also poses something of a "chicken or the egg" philosophical question.



Additionally, Price found that stronger men tend to reject the redistribution of wealth, whether they are financially rich or poor.



"Our results suggest that wealthier men who are more formidable physically are more likely to oppose redistribution of wealth. Essentially, they seem more motivated to defend their resources. But less wealthy men who are still physically formidable don't seem more inclined to support redistribution either," Price said. "They're not demanding a share of the wealth."

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/25/study-physically-weak-men-more-likely-to-be-socialist-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist">https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/2 ... capitalist">https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/25/study-physically-weak-men-more-likely-to-be-socialist-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist

I know you are trolling, but this "study" is hogwash. First of all, progressives like Peaches and his idiotic heroine AOC are NOT SOCIALISTS. They are progressives. They will be the eulogy of the blue collar working classes.

Pogtards are a blight on the entire West. Backed up by billionaires too.

Frood

Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Bricktop"Train drivers are the BEST!!!

Best post. :thumbup:



Factoid, the heaviest freight train of all time was in Australia, not Russia.


Factoid, train driving is pretty easy.
Blahhhhhh...

Bricktop


Frood

Blahhhhhh...

Anonymous

Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Bricktop"Train drivers are the BEST!!!

Best post. :thumbup:



Factoid, the heaviest freight train of all time was in Australia, not Russia.


Factoid, train driving is pretty easy.

Here's another one, you and I wouldn't know anything about operating a freight train.

Frood

Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Bricktop"Train drivers are the BEST!!!

Best post. :thumbup:



Factoid, the heaviest freight train of all time was in Australia, not Russia.


Factoid, train driving is pretty easy.

Here's another one, you and I wouldn't know anything about operating a freight train.


Not a fact. As I mentioned awhile ago, I got to drive a train. The rules were far more complex than actually operating it.
Blahhhhhh...